​

Regulation First Parenting

​

After a difficult performance, the first question may not be what to say, but whether the athlete is ready for words at all.

 

The match is over and she gets into the car without saying much. Her bag lands between her feet, the door closes harder than usual, and she turns toward the window. Maybe she played poorly. Maybe she barely played at all. Maybe she made the mistake that ended the set, was taken out at an important moment, or spent most of the afternoon trying to pretend that something about the team did not bother her as much as it did.

 

The parent already has several things to say. “You played better than you think.” “It was only one match.” “You’ll get another chance.” Maybe there is a practical question too: “Do you know why she took you out?” or “Why don’t you ask your coach what she wants you working on?” None of these statements is inherently unreasonable. Some of them may eventually be helpful. The difficulty is that the athlete may still be angry, embarrassed, exhausted, disappointed, or carrying enough activation from the gym that even well-intended words arrive as one more thing she has to manage.

Regulation First Parenting begins with a different question. Before deciding what would be useful to say, the parent asks whether the athlete is in a place where words can be useful yet.

 

​

​

Parents naturally want to help when their children are hurting. We explain because we want to provide perspective. We reassure because we want to reduce fear. We encourage because we want the athlete to remember that one performance does not define her. The instinct is usually generous, but good intentions do not make every moment a good teaching moment.

 

When an athlete is still activated, encouragement can feel surprisingly different from the way it sounds in the parent’s head. “You’ll be fine” may be heard as pressure to stop feeling bad. “It wasn’t that big a deal” may land as evidence that the parent does not understand why it mattered. A reasonable question about what happened may feel like an evaluation when the athlete has already spent two hours being evaluated publicly. Even reassurance can become another demand if the athlete experiences it as an instruction to feel differently before she is ready.

 

This is why timing is one of the first disciplines of Regulation First Parenting. The same conversation that goes nowhere in the first five minutes after a match may unfold easily later that evening. The same question that feels intrusive in the parking lot may feel supportive after the athlete has eaten, showered, slept, or simply had enough distance from the event to think again. The issue is not that parents should never talk about difficult performances. It is that usefulness depends partly on when the conversation occurs.

 

The Parent Has a Nervous System Too

 

There is another reason waiting can be difficult: silence is uncomfortable for parents.

Sitting beside a child who is disappointed creates its own kind of pressure. Parents may feel helpless, protective, angry, worried, or disappointed themselves. Playing time may seem unfair. Recruiting may be uncertain. A coach’s decision may make little sense from the bleachers. The parent may already be thinking three weeks ahead while the athlete is still trying to get through the ride home.

​

Under those conditions, talking can become a way of regulating the parent as much as helping the athlete. Explaining makes the situation feel more understandable. Problem-solving creates a sense that something is being done. Asking questions reduces uncertainty. Reassurance helps the parent believe that the disappointment will pass. None of this makes the parent selfish; it simply means that parents are part of the same human system and pressure affects them too.

 

A useful question in these moments is whether the words are being offered because the athlete needs them now or because the parent needs the moment to feel less uncomfortable. Sometimes those needs align. Sometimes they do not. Regulation First Parenting asks the adult to notice the difference before handing the parent’s urgency to the athlete to carry.

 

What Regulation First Looks Like

 

Regulation First Parenting is usually much less dramatic than people imagine. It may sound like, “That looked like a tough one. I’m here if you want to talk,” followed by an actual willingness not to talk. It may mean getting food, turning on music, discussing something unrelated to volleyball, or simply driving home without turning the silence into evidence that something is wrong.

​

If the athlete begins talking, the first task is often listening rather than solving. She may need to say that she is furious with herself, embarrassed about being taken out, confused about what the coach wants, or tired of hearing that she should stay positive. A parent does not have to endorse every interpretation in order to hear it. Listening for a while does not mean agreeing that the coach is terrible, the teammate is selfish, or the season is ruined. It means allowing the athlete’s experience to exist long enough for the conversation to become a conversation rather than an immediate correction.

 

This is also a form of co-regulation. Before young athletes can reliably settle themselves under pressure, they have often spent years borrowing steadiness from adults around them. A parent’s tone, pace, face, and willingness not to escalate can communicate that disappointment is survivable. Over time, the goal is not for the parent to keep regulating the athlete indefinitely, but for repeated experiences of steadiness to help the athlete develop more of her own. The Parent Manual describes co-regulation as a bridge toward independence rather than a destination in itself. coaches volleyball final

 

Regulation First Is Not Avoidance

​

There is an easy misunderstanding here. If parents are always waiting until the athlete feels completely calm, receptive, confident, and eager to talk, some conversations may never happen. That is not the goal.

​

Families still have standards. Athletes still have responsibilities. Sometimes behavior after a difficult match needs to be addressed. There may be commitments that need discussion, communication that needs repair, or decisions that cannot simply be postponed because the athlete is uncomfortable. Regulation First Parenting does not mean the athlete controls whether every difficult topic can ever be raised.

 

The distinction is between whether something should be discussed and whether this is the moment when discussion is likely to be useful. A parent can decide that a conversation matters while also recognizing that the first three minutes after a painful loss are probably not the best time to have it. Waiting until everyone has enough capacity to participate is not walking on eggshells. It is sequencing.

That same distinction helps parents stay in their lane. In the MPSS model, the athlete owns the work, the coach teaches the sport, and the parent shapes the environment in which the athlete develops. The car ride home is one of the easiest places for those roles to blur. Questions about strategy, technical corrections, lineup decisions, or what the coach “should have done” can quietly turn the parent into another coach before the athlete has even left the parking lot.

 

Staying in the parent lane does not mean pretending not to understand volleyball or refusing to talk about it. It means remembering that the main purpose of the relationship is larger than the sport. The athlete already has a coach whose job is to teach the game. What the parent uniquely provides is a relationship that can remain stable while the athlete succeeds, struggles, wins roles, loses roles, plays brilliantly, and occasionally has a day she would rather forget.

 

Support Without Taking Over

 

Once the athlete has recovered enough to think clearly, ownership gradually needs to return to her. This is where supportive parenting can become more difficult, because parents often know exactly what they would like their child to do next.

​

Perhaps she should speak with the coach. Perhaps she needs to practice something. Perhaps there is a teammate conflict that needs repair. The parent can help the athlete think through those possibilities, but helping is different from carrying them out on her behalf.

 

A parent might help an athlete think through what she wants to ask a coach without sending the message for her. A parent can listen while she sorts through disappointment without creating a training plan that night. If she needs to apologize to a teammate, the parent can help her find the words without taking over the repair. The underlying message is that support and ownership can exist together: you do not have to handle this alone, and this still belongs to you. The Parent Manual makes this distinction directly, warning that support without ownership can gradually become rescue. coaches volleyball final

 

That balance matters because one of the developmental opportunities inside difficult sports experiences is discovering that disappointment can be survived and acted through. Confidence does not always return before the next step. Sometimes the athlete goes back to practice while still disappointed, asks the coach a question while still uncertain, or takes the next rep before she feels completely ready. Parents support that development best when they provide enough connection that the athlete does not feel alone without taking away the opportunity to discover that she can handle what comes next.

 

The Ride Home Does Not Have to Fix Anything

 

Return to the athlete in the passenger seat. Twenty minutes into the drive, she may start talking. She may ask what the parent thought. She may complain about the coach, cry about the mistake, laugh about something that happened on the bench, or suddenly change the subject entirely. The parent now has more information about what she needs because the athlete has had enough space to begin showing it.

​

Or she may say almost nothing all the way home. That does not mean the parent missed the opportunity to turn the loss into a lesson. Not every difficult experience needs to be processed before the car reaches the driveway, and not every meaningful parenting moment looks like a meaningful conversation.

 

Sometimes the most important thing the parent communicates is simply that a bad match did not change the relationship, disappointment does not have to be solved immediately, and home remains a place where the athlete can come down from the experience before deciding what to do with it.

 

Regulation First Parenting is therefore less about finding perfect words after difficult moments than about recognizing that timing, steadiness, and relationship help determine whether our words can be useful at all.